"Voting shambles".... "a tactical ploy which probably worked". These were the heading and conclusions of a letter to the Editor of a prominent, local English language newspaper. They sum up exactly what C.L.A.R.O. thinks about the organisation of the municipal elections in Orihuela Costa on 24 May.
There was confusion in the description of the voting centres on the Voting Cards (tarjetas censales) informing registered voters where they should vote. The Playa Flamenca Town Hall (Ayuntamiento) and the Reading Point in Lomas de Cabo Roig were described respectively as Oficina Municipal Playa Flamenca and Centro Municipal Orihuela Costa. If the Town Hall had been called Ayuntamiento this would have helped avoid confusion but nobody knows the Oficina Municipal Orihuela Costa and it would not have helped much by calling it Reading Point, as this is also little known. The basic mistake is to use as one of the three polling stations in Orihuela Costa a little known unobtrusive building six kilometres from the main population centre of Orihuela Costa
More confusing, however, were the boundaries drawn for the polling stations. These had changed radically since the local elections in 2011. Those living in the centre of Orihuela Costa, essentially Playa Flamenca and La Florida, who previously voted in the Town Hall or Civic Centre were obliged in 2015 to vote in different centres. The polling station for those living in La Florida became the Civic Centre further away than the Town Hall and the polling station of those living in Playa Flamenca became the little known, poorly sign posted Reading Point in Lomas de Cabo Roig, 6 kilometres from where they live. These changes were already introduced for the European Parliament elections in 2014 and there were many criticisms. Despite this, the Town Hall maintained the arrangements which they are responsible for notifying to the Electoral Authorities (Censo Electoral). The result was confusion and inconvenience on a large scale, especially for the hundreds of people who, in order to vote, were supposed to travel some 6 kilometres from where they live and where they had voted in the past.
Why all this unnecessary hassle when other public buildings in the central Playa Flamenca area (such as the schools at the top of the market street, Nicolas de Bussy) could have been used? In a democracy, it is the responsibility of the local government to facilitate the vote of its residents not to obstruct it.
Hundreds of complaints were made by voters to those from various political parties on official polling station duties (apoderados and interventores) in the Playa Flamenca office of the Town Hall and the Civic Centre, especially by those supposed to vote in the Reading Point. For those with cars, the prospect of driving 6 kilometres to a location they did not know and were not confident would be sufficiently well signposted to find, was sufficient to persuade many not to try. For those without cars or users of mobility vehicles it was out of the question, although several people were driven to the Reading Point by volunteers helping at the polling stations.
Could these consequences for the vote on 24 May have occurred to the politicians in the Socialist-led government who decided on these boundaries? The Socialist Party was known not to be interested in its vote on the coast. It received only 277 votes, its worst result ever In the letter to the Editor the answer to the question was provided - "a tactic which probably worked" – in other words, "gerrymandering".
The politicians and officials in the Orihuela Town Hall openly hide behind a discriminatory Spanish law which excludes non-Spanish voters from the calculation to determine the number of polling stations which must be provided. This law is particularly discriminatory in Orihuela Costa where nearly 60% of the voters are non-Spanish. The law does not prevent the local government from increasing the minimum number of polling stations, as C.L.AR.O. confirmed when we were successful in having the electoral authorities increase the number of tables in the polling stations in Orihuela Costa. We were unfortunately too late to try to have the number of polling stations increased.
C.L.A.R.O. is determined to challenge what may have been electoral fraud. We will do so not because the confusion and obstacles to voting almost certainly cost the coast a directly elected C.L.A.R.O. councillor (we were only 50 votes short of success). It is too late to change that. But there will be a next time and we cannot allow the legal, democratic rights of those living in Orihuela Costa to be abused. If Orihuela Costa's political voice is not heard, the quality of life will suffer.
C.L.A.R.O. will petition the European Parliament to denounce the discriminatory law which excludes the number of non-Spanish voters from the calculation of the number of polling stations which must legally be provided. This has been the pretext which the Orihuela Town Hall has sheltered behind in limiting the number of polling stations in Orihuela Costa to three. We will also challenge the way in which the boundaries were drawn, causing confusion and obliging unreasonable distances to be travelled to exercise the right to vote.
A Petition to the European Parliament will inevitably take time before it can succeed. This was our experience in C.L.A.R.O.'s 2007 Petition when voting application forms were not delivered by post to non-Spanish residents living in Orihuela Costa because the government had not provided the coast with official street names and house numbers. We were eventually successful, thanks to which we have the basis of an operative postal service – only to be challenged later in other ways!
However, we are conscious that Spanish voters in Orihuela Costa could soon be affected again by the unfair geographic provision of polling stations. National elections are due before the end of the year. As a local party, C.L.A.R.O.'s legal remit does not extend to national issues. However, Spanish C.L.A.R.O. members will appeal to the Electoral Authorities to ensure that in the coming national elections, Spanish residents of Orihuela Costa exercise their vote fairly and democratically and to oblige the Orihuela local government to remove obstacles to their doing so.
The Popular Party was the winner in the municipal elections in Orihuela on 24 May. Despite being divided, they secured 11 seats in the new Town Council, two short of an absolute majority. On the left, the Socialists and Change Orihuela won 10 seats. Ciudadanos, which is the former discredited CLR party, won 3 seats. Unfortunately, C.L.A.R.O. failed by some 50 votes to keep its one councillor. We will see soon if the Popular Party chooses to govern as a minority or if they succumb to the temptation of forming a majority government with Ciudadanos, despite their frequent comments during the election campaign that Ciudadanos was a party of "interests" and not those of the people of Orihuela.
The vote in Orihuela Costa once again showed that C.L.A.R.O. is the party which enjoys overwhelming support from local residents – provisional figures
As in the two previous elections, C.L.A.R.O. won almost 50% of the vote of the coast. This year we won almost the same number of votes as all the other parties together. We also received more direct support for C.L.A.R.O. than previously from voters in Orihuela city. Why then did C.L.A.R.O. not succeed in electing at least one councillor?
We failed by .03% to reach the threshold of 5% below which votes are not taken into account for the attribution of councillors by proportional representation. We got 4.97% of the total vote, some 50 votes short of the 5% threshold.
There are several explanations why C.L.A.R.O. fell short of the required minimum. Spanish but importantly, the majority of non-Spanish EU voters, mainly British, who live in the centre of Orihuela Costa, principally in Playa Flamenca, were obliged to vote in the little known, poorly sign posted Reading Point in Lomas de Cabo Roig, nearly 6 kilometres from Playa Flamenca Town Hall. Dozens, perhaps hundreds of voters turned up in the polling station in Playa Flamenca Town Hall and the Civic Centre expecting to vote close to where they live, many living as close as 150 metres from the Town Hall, only to be told they had to go to the polling station in Lomas de Cabo Roig. Many tried and could not find the Reading Point. Others, because they did not have transport or were simply discouraged, did not bother. The 50 vote shortfall could easily have been accounted for by their experience.
The provision of polling stations is principally the responsibility of the Orihuela local government and the Socialist majority in the outgoing government just did not care to propose an additional polling station, for example in one of the schools at the top of the market street in the heart of Playa Flamenca. The Socialist Party in the outgoing government had little political interest in facilitating votes on the coast since they get so few and have done so little for Orihueal Costa in the last 4 years.
However, we cannot ignore another important reason for the failure of the party of the coast to get at least one councillor elected: APATHY. The percentage turnout of voters on the coast fell from 42% in 2011 to just over 33% on 24 May. Too few people, although living permanently in Orihuela Costa, on the Padron and benefitting from the Spanish Health service, have registered to vote. There are potentially 25,000 non-Spanish EU residents, mainly British, entitled to register to vote but only just over 4,000 have done so (16%). We know they face difficulties in the Playa Flamenca Town Hall. But the majority simply do not feel sufficiently concerned about getting a fair deal for the taxes they pay, the often shocking state of street cleanliness, lack of parks and gardens and social- cultural facilities and saving the last green area on the sea front, Cala Mosca. The majority of non-Spanish EU residents living here fail to realise that the value of their properties in our area depends on the quality of life and services they receive.